Call for Papers
Blue Sky
Introduction
The AIED Society organizes the AIED conference and is aimed at advancing science and engineering of intelligent human-technology ecosystems that support learning. The AIED 2026 conference will be the 27th of a longstanding series of international conferences, known for high quality and innovative research on AI-assisted systems and cognitive science approaches for educational computing applications. AIED is ranked A in CORE (top 14.9% of all 785 ranked venues), the well-known ranking of computer science conferences.
Given the success of this track during the last three years, AIED 2026 will include the BlueSky special track, which invites papers from researchers, practitioners, and industry partners to reflect upon the progress of AIED so far and envision what is to come. As AI continues to become deeply embedded in everyday educational practice and rapid advances and adoption of Generative AI are reshaping how people learn, teach, assess, and even think about knowledge itself, we must ask: How will AI innovations transform the way we learn? How will human–AI relationships in learning environments evolve over time? AIED will continue to develop beyond augmenting conventional teaching methods and embrace a new era of learning that is dynamic, adaptive, and truly personalized and transformative. Whether it's customizing content to suit individual needs or creating innovative immersive (or AI-augmented) learning environments, AI's potential in education is boundless.
So, what's next for AI in education? This year's BlueSky track embraces the conference theme "From Tools to Teammates: Human-AI Synergy for Augmented Learning." We seek bold visions that reimagine AI not as instruments that merely deliver instruction, but as partners, collaborators, and amplifiers that embed the principles of human agency and thought. Whether we envision new forms of collaborative problem solving, reimagine assessment as a shared human-AI endeavor, or propose new frameworks for AI teammates, we invite contributions that chart ambitious, yet human-centered paths forward.
These are questions meant to begin and not limit the discussion in the BlueSky papers.
Submission Instructions
Submission System
Please note that the submissions must be written in English. Papers should be submitted electronically, as a PDF file, through the AIED 2026 EasyChair conference system and selecting the "Blue Sky" track.
Types of Submissions
We encourage two types of submissions (reviewers will comment on whether the size is appropriate for each contribution):
- Full papers (between 9 and 14 pages including references; for a long oral presentation)
- Short papers (between 6 and 8 pages including references; for a short oral presentation)
Note that appendices may not be included in submitted papers.
Submission Format
Submissions must be in Springer format. Papers that do not use the required format may be rejected without review. Authors should consult Springer's authors' guidelines and use their proceedings templates, either for LaTeX or for Word, for the preparation of their papers. Springer encourages authors to include their ORCIDs in their papers.
Submissions must follow Springer policies on publication (including policies on the use of AI in the authoring process): https://tinyurl.com/3rk3zj3v.
Expectations
BlueSky paper submissions do not necessarily require new empirical results, unlike more traditional AIED submissions. Despite BlueSky submissions' focus on novel, exploratory solutions for the future, there is still the need to support their ideas with sufficient evidence. When BlueSky submissions focus on novel perspectives on existing problems or a new research vision, as examples, they might not require empirical results. However, such submissions are still expected to defend their positions via robust scientific argument rooted in the relevant literature. A thorough exploration of implications, with detailed discussions, are considered important as well.
Ethics, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
The AIED Society values diversity, equity, and inclusion (and related principles under this broad umbrella) as essential and fundamental values for the AIED community to uphold. Thus, in AIED 2026, we incentivize authors to carefully consider diversity, equity, and inclusion when reporting on your work.
Authors should demonstrate awareness of how ethical issues (including but not limited to equity, inclusion, accessibility) impact the content of their paper, also including if available data, methods, tools, approaches, products, and findings. If tools such as ChatBots are used to help in writing papers, this should be acknowledged in the paper.
Authors should attend carefully to inclusive language and framing. This includes thoughtful use of identity-first or person-first language, gender-neutral terminology, and appropriate demographic categories, while avoiding the conflation of distinct constructs such as race and ethnicity or sex and gender. Authors are also encouraged to reflect on how issues of diversity, equity, and inclusion relate to their theoretical frameworks, findings and future visions of AIED. This reflection may include examining how these issues shape assumptions, hypotheses, methods, and interpretations, as well as considering the broader implications of the work for equity and inclusion in learning technologies and AI-infused learning environments.
In reporting samples and analyses, authors should clearly describe the composition of any human-sourced data, including relevant demographic characteristics, whether drawn from participants, corpus data or training datasets. While skewed or non-representative samples do not automatically warrant rejection, authors should acknowledge demographic imbalances, discuss their potential impact on results and conclusions, and, where possible, describe barriers to representative sampling and steps taken to address them. Authors should demonstrate awareness of how equity, inclusion, accessibility, and bias affect their data, methods, and outcomes, particularly in contexts such as educational technology or corpus analysis. Finally, authors are encouraged to justify how demographic variables are handled analytically, including whether and why they are included, excluded, or controlled for, the assumptions underlying their use, and the extent to which effects are independent, interdependent, or intersectional, while clearly articulating both valid and potentially misleading conclusions.
Review Process
Process
All submissions will be reviewed by 2-3 members of the program committee or other ad-hoc reviewers, followed by a meta-review conducted by a senior member of the program committee. Papers will be reviewed for relevance to the track, quality of reflection, originality and innovation, significance and potential for influence, multidisciplinarity and societal impact considerations, clarity and coherence of presentation. It is important to note that the work presented should not have been published previously or be under consideration in other conferences of journals. Any paper caught in double submission will be rejected without review. In addition, as we are looking forward to pushing the boundaries in this track, you will also receive an AI-based review --using local LLMs as one of the reviewers. This is an unscored review to help you improve your final submission further.
Anonymity
The process will be double-blind, i.e., both authors and reviewers will remain anonymous, to meet rigorous academic standards of publication. Hence, authors should eliminate all information that could lead to their identification, cite their own prior work (if needed) in third person, and remove acknowledgments and references to funding sources.
Evaluation Criteria
Reviewers of papers in the BlueSky track will evaluate submissions based on the following criteria:
- Relevance and Forward Advancement: To what extent are the ideas relevant and compelling for the AIED research community? Do they meaningfully extend current thinking and articulate plausible future directions for AI in Education, rather than incremental advances on existing work?
- Novelty and Vision (Degree of "Blue Sky" Thinking): How original, imaginative, and forward-looking are the ideas? Do they challenge prevailing assumptions, introduce unconventional perspectives, or propose new paradigms that go beyond the current state of the art?
- Background and Conceptual Foundation: Are the ideas well motivated and grounded in a solid understanding of foundational theories and prior AIED research? Do the authors appropriately engage with both classic literature and relevant recent work (e.g., from the past five years) to situate and justify their vision?
- Impact and Practical Significance: What is the potential breadth and depth of impact on the AIED research agenda? How might the proposed ideas influence educational practice, learners, educators, or other stakeholders, and are practical, ethical, or contextual considerations thoughtfully addressed?
- Rigor and Clarity of Argumentation: Are the ideas communicated clearly, coherently, and with appropriate rigor? Does the paper demonstrate strong critical reflection, explicitly articulating assumptions, limitations, and open questions while building a persuasive and well-structured argument?
Registration and Participation
Accepted papers in the BlueSky track will be published in the conference proceedings.
Each accepted paper within the BlueSky track must be accompanied by a unique author registration (i.e., one registration per paper), completed by the early registration date cut-off. Please note that presenters of papers accepted to the BlueSky track are expected to be on-site to give their presentations and interact with the audience, to have the paper included in the proceedings. An online streaming option will be set-up for remote observers.
Important Dates
- Abstracts due: 27 February 2026
- Papers due:
3 March 2026Extended to 5 March 2026 - Notification of acceptance: 27 March 2026
- Camera-ready paper due: 12 April 2026
Note: the submission deadline is at 11:59 pm AoE (Anywhere on Earth) time.
Program Committee
Ana Serrano Mamolar
University of Burgos, Spain
Benedict du Boulay
University of Sussex, UK
Beverly Woolf
University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA
Bruce McLaren
Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Danielle Allessio
University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA
Gordon McCalla
University of Saskatchewan, Canada
Kasia Muldner
Carleton University, Canada
Krishna Kathala
Ohio State University, USA
Ma. Mercedes T. Rodrigo
Ateneo de Manila University, Philippines
Neil T. Heffernan
Worcester Polytechnic Institute, USA
Nikol Rummel
Ruhr University Bochum, Germany
Paulo Carvalho
Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Peter Hastings
DePaul University, USA
Ryan Baker
University of Pennsylvania, USA
Sunčica Hadžidedić
Durham University, UK
Ido Roll
Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Israel
Tanja Mitrovic
University of Canterbury, New Zealand
Art Graesser
University of Memphis, USA
Sai Gattupalli
University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA
Pablo Arnau-González
Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain
Gadea Lucas Pérez
Universidad de Burgos, Spain
Yanjie Song
The Education University of Hong Kong, China
Blair Lehman
Brighter Research, USA
Cheng Xiang Zhai
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA
Eric Tsui
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, China
Caitlin Tenison
ETS, USA